<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251520</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to remand the matter for calculating disallowance under section 14A, citing a previous High Court order on a similar issue. The court also affirmed the allowance of expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) related to an interest-free advance, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decision consistent with factual evidence and previous rulings. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s order was deemed valid without legal errors, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251520</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to remand the matter for calculating disallowance under section 14A, citing a previous High Court order on a similar issue. The court also affirmed the allowance of expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) related to an interest-free advance, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decision consistent with factual evidence and previous rulings. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s order was deemed valid without legal errors, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>