https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166290 The Court held that the respondent Committee's bye-laws, which effectively prohibited the petitioner, a wholesale dealer, from conducting business by granting a monopoly to a contractor, infringed the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g). The imposition of fees by the Committee was deemed illegal as it exceeded their legal authority and was not justified by valid law. The Court declared the bye-laws ultra vires and directed the Committee to allow the petitioner to continue business until valid bye-laws were enacted, with costs awarded to the petitioner. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166290 The Court held that the respondent Committee's bye-laws, which effectively prohibited the petitioner, a wholesale dealer, from conducting business by granting a monopoly to a contractor, infringed the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g). The imposition of fees by the Committee was deemed illegal as it exceeded their legal authority and was not justified by valid law. The Court declared the bye-laws ultra vires and directed the Committee to allow the petitioner to continue business until valid bye-laws were enacted, with costs awarded to the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166290