<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 533 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251507</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the pre-deposit condition for stay/waiver of deposit, emphasizing the importance of consistency in interim orders. The Court directed the appellant to deposit a specific sum within a set timeline to enable a stay without coercive measures for four weeks. The decision aimed to ensure fairness and justice for the appellant, highlighting the significance of uniformity in decisions to prevent arbitrary deviations and maintain predictability in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:17:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 533 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251507</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the pre-deposit condition for stay/waiver of deposit, emphasizing the importance of consistency in interim orders. The Court directed the appellant to deposit a specific sum within a set timeline to enable a stay without coercive measures for four weeks. The decision aimed to ensure fairness and justice for the appellant, highlighting the significance of uniformity in decisions to prevent arbitrary deviations and maintain predictability in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>