<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 530 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251504</link>
    <description>The Court found that the Tribunal erred in proceeding ex parte and passing an order without sufficient justification. The impugned orders were quashed, with the appellant directed to pay costs to the respondents. The matter was scheduled for a fresh hearing by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of advocate presence and fair consideration of requests for postponement to ensure justice and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 530 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251504</link>
      <description>The Court found that the Tribunal erred in proceeding ex parte and passing an order without sufficient justification. The impugned orders were quashed, with the appellant directed to pay costs to the respondents. The matter was scheduled for a fresh hearing by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of advocate presence and fair consideration of requests for postponement to ensure justice and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>