https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251502 The appellant challenged the Tribunal's order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 13 lakhs for hearing the appeal, citing financial burden and hindrance to their right of appeal. Despite the appellant's plea of financial difficulty, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence supporting the claim and upheld the pre-deposit order. The comparison with a previous case granting 100% waiver was dismissed, emphasizing the discretion in such decisions. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, directing the appellant to pre-deposit the entire amount within eight weeks, with the judgment noting the lack of merit in the appellant's arguments. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251502 The appellant challenged the Tribunal's order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 13 lakhs for hearing the appeal, citing financial burden and hindrance to their right of appeal. Despite the appellant's plea of financial difficulty, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence supporting the claim and upheld the pre-deposit order. The comparison with a previous case granting 100% waiver was dismissed, emphasizing the discretion in such decisions. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, directing the appellant to pre-deposit the entire amount within eight weeks, with the judgment noting the lack of merit in the appellant's arguments. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251502