<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 658 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166281</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were not liable to deduct tax under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act for the rent paid for plant and machinery usage. The Court found that the agreement between the assessee and the premises owner specified payment only for plant and machinery, not for land and building use. As a result, the Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Department, concluding that no penalty was warranted against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 658 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166281</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were not liable to deduct tax under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act for the rent paid for plant and machinery usage. The Court found that the agreement between the assessee and the premises owner specified payment only for plant and machinery, not for land and building use. As a result, the Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Department, concluding that no penalty was warranted against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>