<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 501 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251475</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that income derived from leasing out a property was classified as income from house property rather than business income. The court emphasized that the building leased did not contain specialized plant and machinery for commercial exploitation, indicating the income stemmed from ownership rather than active business operations. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the income&#039;s classification as income from house property based on legal provisions and factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:02:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 501 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251475</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that income derived from leasing out a property was classified as income from house property rather than business income. The court emphasized that the building leased did not contain specialized plant and machinery for commercial exploitation, indicating the income stemmed from ownership rather than active business operations. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the income&#039;s classification as income from house property based on legal provisions and factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>