<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 497 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, leading to the deletion of the additions of Rs. 15,99,471/- on account of Dharmarth Receipts and Rs. 2,09,00,000/- due to the increased purchase cost of the leasehold godown. The Tribunal determined that the Dharmarth Receipts were not taxable and that Section 50C did not apply to the purchase of immovable property, resulting in the cancellation of both additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 497 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, leading to the deletion of the additions of Rs. 15,99,471/- on account of Dharmarth Receipts and Rs. 2,09,00,000/- due to the increased purchase cost of the leasehold godown. The Tribunal determined that the Dharmarth Receipts were not taxable and that Section 50C did not apply to the purchase of immovable property, resulting in the cancellation of both additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>