<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 496 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting major additions related to undisclosed investments in the hospital building and unexplained credits. Disallowance of depreciation on certain assets was confirmed. The Tribunal stressed the limits of jurisdiction under Section 142A and the need for substantiating claims with proper evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 496 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting major additions related to undisclosed investments in the hospital building and unexplained credits. Disallowance of depreciation on certain assets was confirmed. The Tribunal stressed the limits of jurisdiction under Section 142A and the need for substantiating claims with proper evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>