<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 474 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251448</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to show cause notices raising a duty demand was not entertained at the notice stage, and the petition was disposed of without examining the merits of the proposed demand. The High Court directed the authority to decide the pending representation on classification of PTO shafts within one month, leaving the classification issue to be considered administratively before further action on the notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 474 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251448</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to show cause notices raising a duty demand was not entertained at the notice stage, and the petition was disposed of without examining the merits of the proposed demand. The High Court directed the authority to decide the pending representation on classification of PTO shafts within one month, leaving the classification issue to be considered administratively before further action on the notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>