<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 473 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251447</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order in a case involving a challenge to a Stay Application, finding a violation of natural justice due to lack of notice to the petitioner. The court noted the confusion in appeal numbers between the company and its Managing Director, emphasizing the need for both appeals to be heard together. The order was deemed arbitrary and illegal, leading to its annulment. The court directed the respondent to reconsider the applications from both appeals jointly, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard and closing any pending miscellaneous petitions without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 473 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251447</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order in a case involving a challenge to a Stay Application, finding a violation of natural justice due to lack of notice to the petitioner. The court noted the confusion in appeal numbers between the company and its Managing Director, emphasizing the need for both appeals to be heard together. The order was deemed arbitrary and illegal, leading to its annulment. The court directed the respondent to reconsider the applications from both appeals jointly, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard and closing any pending miscellaneous petitions without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>