<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 465 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251439</link>
    <description>Sales of DEPB licences described as local sales against form S.T.-15 declarations were treated as inter-State sales because the evidence showed direct payment from outside Haryana and the local purchasers appeared to be only dummy or intermediary names. The statutory declarations did not protect transactions found to be fraudulent, and the appellant&#039;s failure to produce bank records and supporting correspondence reinforced the conclusion. On that basis, the reassessment and penalty orders were sustained and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 465 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251439</link>
      <description>Sales of DEPB licences described as local sales against form S.T.-15 declarations were treated as inter-State sales because the evidence showed direct payment from outside Haryana and the local purchasers appeared to be only dummy or intermediary names. The statutory declarations did not protect transactions found to be fraudulent, and the appellant&#039;s failure to produce bank records and supporting correspondence reinforced the conclusion. On that basis, the reassessment and penalty orders were sustained and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>