<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 456 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251430</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner to pay the specified tax amounts, leading to the immediate release of the detained goods. The petitioner was also permitted to challenge the penalty proceedings by filing a revision before the jurisdictional Joint Commissioner. No costs were imposed on the petitioner, and the related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:06:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 456 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251430</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner to pay the specified tax amounts, leading to the immediate release of the detained goods. The petitioner was also permitted to challenge the penalty proceedings by filing a revision before the jurisdictional Joint Commissioner. No costs were imposed on the petitioner, and the related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>