<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 453 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251427</link>
    <description>The court held that the impugned assessment order was not barred by limitation as it was completed within the prescribed period of four years. The court also found that the assessment was valid and in accordance with the law, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim of exemption from CST. The petitioner was directed to bear the costs, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 453 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251427</link>
      <description>The court held that the impugned assessment order was not barred by limitation as it was completed within the prescribed period of four years. The court also found that the assessment was valid and in accordance with the law, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claim of exemption from CST. The petitioner was directed to bear the costs, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>