<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 444 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251418</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in job-work manufacture of goods cleared under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. was treated as admissible because settled precedent, including Escorts Limited and allied High Court rulings, had already rejected denial of credit merely due to exemption from duty on the finished goods. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that precedent was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the credit was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 444 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251418</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in job-work manufacture of goods cleared under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. was treated as admissible because settled precedent, including Escorts Limited and allied High Court rulings, had already rejected denial of credit merely due to exemption from duty on the finished goods. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that precedent was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the credit was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>