<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 430 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251404</link>
    <description>Amounts paid under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 pursuant to a declaration under Section 88 could not be refunded because Section 93 expressly barred refund of any amount paid under the Scheme. The assessee, having elected to settle the dispute under the statutory framework and paid the amount determined by the designated authority, could not later rely on the earlier assessment position to claim return of that sum. An assessment order directing such refund was therefore contrary to the statutory prohibition and was treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, justifying revision under Section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 430 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251404</link>
      <description>Amounts paid under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 pursuant to a declaration under Section 88 could not be refunded because Section 93 expressly barred refund of any amount paid under the Scheme. The assessee, having elected to settle the dispute under the statutory framework and paid the amount determined by the designated authority, could not later rely on the earlier assessment position to claim return of that sum. An assessment order directing such refund was therefore contrary to the statutory prohibition and was treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, justifying revision under Section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>