<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 889 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166279</link>
    <description>The Court held that under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, penalties cannot be reduced below the prescribed limit. Section 80 allows for no penalty if reasonable cause is proven, not a reduced penalty. The Tribunal erred in reducing penalties below the minimum prescribed limit. The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 889 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166279</link>
      <description>The Court held that under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, penalties cannot be reduced below the prescribed limit. Section 80 allows for no penalty if reasonable cause is proven, not a reduced penalty. The Tribunal erred in reducing penalties below the minimum prescribed limit. The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>