<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 425 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251399</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the appeal, setting aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The judgment clarified legal provisions regarding tax deduction at source, liability of the deductor, and protection for the assessee under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act. The involvement of the Official Liquidator highlighted the shift in liability due to the company&#039;s liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 425 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251399</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the appeal, setting aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The judgment clarified legal provisions regarding tax deduction at source, liability of the deductor, and protection for the assessee under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act. The involvement of the Official Liquidator highlighted the shift in liability due to the company&#039;s liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>