<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 421 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251395</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the denial of input tax credit to the appellant, a purchaser-dealer, for failing to prove the actual purchase and movement of goods worth Rs. 42,46,800 from vendors. Despite evidence of stock and invoices, the court found a lack of proof of tax payment on purchases, emphasizing the absence of genuine transactions. The court differentiated the case from precedent, highlighting the crucial evidence gap. With consistent findings across authorities, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding the input tax credit claim was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 421 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251395</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the denial of input tax credit to the appellant, a purchaser-dealer, for failing to prove the actual purchase and movement of goods worth Rs. 42,46,800 from vendors. Despite evidence of stock and invoices, the court found a lack of proof of tax payment on purchases, emphasizing the absence of genuine transactions. The court differentiated the case from precedent, highlighting the crucial evidence gap. With consistent findings across authorities, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding the input tax credit claim was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>