<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166278</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the moiety of the dividend declared on October 14, 1952, was not properly includible in the assessee&#039;s total income for the previous year S.Y. 2008. However, the &#039;P. portion of the dividend income&#039; was deemed part of the assessee&#039;s total income for the same year. The court also held that the assessee was entitled to relief on the &#039;P. portion of the dividend income&#039; under the Indo-Pakistan Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:49:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166278</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the moiety of the dividend declared on October 14, 1952, was not properly includible in the assessee&#039;s total income for the previous year S.Y. 2008. However, the &#039;P. portion of the dividend income&#039; was deemed part of the assessee&#039;s total income for the same year. The court also held that the assessee was entitled to relief on the &#039;P. portion of the dividend income&#039; under the Indo-Pakistan Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>