<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 418 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251392</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the warrant of attachment and eviction notice related to a property in Defence Colony. The petitioners, deemed innocent purchasers without notice of encumbrances, were found to have clear title to the property. The court held that the attachment order was not binding on the petitioners, allowing them relief while permitting the recovery of dues from the sixth respondent through alternative legal avenues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 418 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251392</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the warrant of attachment and eviction notice related to a property in Defence Colony. The petitioners, deemed innocent purchasers without notice of encumbrances, were found to have clear title to the property. The court held that the attachment order was not binding on the petitioners, allowing them relief while permitting the recovery of dues from the sixth respondent through alternative legal avenues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>