https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251385 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the rejection of the Rectification of Mistake Application (ROM) by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant's arguments for rectification based on mistakes in the order were not accepted, with the Tribunal maintaining its decision. Additionally, the Tribunal found the appellant liable for excess stock of lead ingots, clandestine removal of goods without duty payment, and evasion of duty, upholding the demand for duty, interest, and penalty against the appellant. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251385 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the rejection of the Rectification of Mistake Application (ROM) by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant's arguments for rectification based on mistakes in the order were not accepted, with the Tribunal maintaining its decision. Additionally, the Tribunal found the appellant liable for excess stock of lead ingots, clandestine removal of goods without duty payment, and evasion of duty, upholding the demand for duty, interest, and penalty against the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251385