<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 404 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251378</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the amendment of the cause title in the writ petition. The dispute centered on whether bill discounting charges should be included in determining raw material costs for excise duty. The Tribunal remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive examination and timely reasoning. The judgment addressed procedural issues, legal interpretation, decision consistency, and the Tribunal&#039;s duty to provide reasoned decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 404 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251378</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the amendment of the cause title in the writ petition. The dispute centered on whether bill discounting charges should be included in determining raw material costs for excise duty. The Tribunal remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive examination and timely reasoning. The judgment addressed procedural issues, legal interpretation, decision consistency, and the Tribunal&#039;s duty to provide reasoned decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>