https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251377 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of CHA Licence No. 11/427 due to lack of evidence proving subletting allegations and failure to substantiate charges under CHALR, 2004. The appellant successfully argued that the individuals in question were marketing agents, not subletters, supported by the CHA Section report. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and procedural compliance in such matters, ruling in favor of the appellant and providing consequential relief by overturning the revocation order and forfeiture of the security deposit. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251377 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of CHA Licence No. 11/427 due to lack of evidence proving subletting allegations and failure to substantiate charges under CHALR, 2004. The appellant successfully argued that the individuals in question were marketing agents, not subletters, supported by the CHA Section report. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and procedural compliance in such matters, ruling in favor of the appellant and providing consequential relief by overturning the revocation order and forfeiture of the security deposit. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251377