<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251364</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the inclusion of items in block assessment and the assessment of a shareholder as benami. The court held that only adverse material discovered during search, not items disclosed in earlier returns, can form the basis for block assessment. Additionally, if a shareholder is deemed benami, only the real shareholder should be assessed for investments. The court did not address the remaining issues in detail, and the appeal was partly allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251364</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the inclusion of items in block assessment and the assessment of a shareholder as benami. The court held that only adverse material discovered during search, not items disclosed in earlier returns, can form the basis for block assessment. Additionally, if a shareholder is deemed benami, only the real shareholder should be assessed for investments. The court did not address the remaining issues in detail, and the appeal was partly allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>