<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 373 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251347</link>
    <description>Suppression of an earlier writ petition and its interim order was treated as a serious lapse, justifying modification of interim relief, and the earlier blanket suspension of the impugned memoranda and notifications was vacated. However, the court preserved interim protection for the assessment component applying the amended rule to earlier assessment years, holding that this distinct turnover-computation issue required final adjudication. The Revenue was permitted to redraw the demand and proceed further, including on attachment, on that basis. The objection based on the availability of a statutory appeal and writ maintainability was left open for decision in the main proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 373 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251347</link>
      <description>Suppression of an earlier writ petition and its interim order was treated as a serious lapse, justifying modification of interim relief, and the earlier blanket suspension of the impugned memoranda and notifications was vacated. However, the court preserved interim protection for the assessment component applying the amended rule to earlier assessment years, holding that this distinct turnover-computation issue required final adjudication. The Revenue was permitted to redraw the demand and proceed further, including on attachment, on that basis. The objection based on the availability of a statutory appeal and writ maintainability was left open for decision in the main proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>