<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 371 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251345</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals by the Revenue and dismissed those by the assessee, determining that the transaction involved the transfer of the right to use cranes, making it subject to VAT under the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court emphasized that the nature of the transaction, as analyzed under VAT law, was key in determining its tax liability, regardless of the service tax provisions post-amendment in 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 371 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251345</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals by the Revenue and dismissed those by the assessee, determining that the transaction involved the transfer of the right to use cranes, making it subject to VAT under the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court emphasized that the nature of the transaction, as analyzed under VAT law, was key in determining its tax liability, regardless of the service tax provisions post-amendment in 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>