<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251342</link>
    <description>Clearances from one 100% export-oriented unit to another 100% export-oriented unit, though treated as deemed exports, are to be regarded as physical exports for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The court applied binding precedent on the same factual position and found no distinguishing feature, so the Tribunal&#039;s view was not interfered with. The principle affirmed is that deemed export between two 100% EOUs can satisfy the export requirement for Rule 5 refund where precedent directly covers the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251342</link>
      <description>Clearances from one 100% export-oriented unit to another 100% export-oriented unit, though treated as deemed exports, are to be regarded as physical exports for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The court applied binding precedent on the same factual position and found no distinguishing feature, so the Tribunal&#039;s view was not interfered with. The principle affirmed is that deemed export between two 100% EOUs can satisfy the export requirement for Rule 5 refund where precedent directly covers the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>