<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 367 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251341</link>
    <description>The Court held that the refund claim filed beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was time-barred. It was established that the assessments were final, not provisional, and the relevant date for the refund claim had passed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and the refund claim was denied due to being barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 367 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251341</link>
      <description>The Court held that the refund claim filed beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was time-barred. It was established that the assessments were final, not provisional, and the relevant date for the refund claim had passed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and the refund claim was denied due to being barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>