<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 358 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) by considering only investments that yielded exempt income. The computation under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was upheld. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234D was left to be consequentially determined. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 358 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) by considering only investments that yielded exempt income. The computation under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was upheld. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234D was left to be consequentially determined. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>