<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 352 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251326</link>
    <description>Payments for port-project studies and report preparation to a non-resident consultant were analysed under the India-UK DTAA to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services. The material point was that the consultant only prepared preliminary studies and did not transfer technical knowledge, skill, know-how or a process so as to enable the payer to apply it independently in future. Because the treaty definition is narrower than the domestic definition, the wider scope of section 9(1)(vii) did not govern. The payment therefore failed the &quot;make available&quot; test, was not chargeable as fees for technical services, and no tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 352 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251326</link>
      <description>Payments for port-project studies and report preparation to a non-resident consultant were analysed under the India-UK DTAA to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services. The material point was that the consultant only prepared preliminary studies and did not transfer technical knowledge, skill, know-how or a process so as to enable the payer to apply it independently in future. Because the treaty definition is narrower than the domestic definition, the wider scope of section 9(1)(vii) did not govern. The payment therefore failed the &quot;make available&quot; test, was not chargeable as fees for technical services, and no tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>