<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 346 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant by setting aside the demand and penalties related to computer training services beyond the normal limitation period. The penalty for manpower recruitment and supply agency services was reduced to reflect the period after 16.6.2005. However, the demands and penalties for intellectual property services and business support services were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 346 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant by setting aside the demand and penalties related to computer training services beyond the normal limitation period. The penalty for manpower recruitment and supply agency services was reduced to reflect the period after 16.6.2005. However, the demands and penalties for intellectual property services and business support services were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>