<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 343 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251317</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld a pre-deposit of Rs. 67 lakhs for the Meadows Project and reduced the pre-deposit for the Pacifica Project to 75% of Rs. 183 lakhs. The petitioner was directed to make the deposits within three weeks for expedited hearing and disposal of appeals by the CESTAT. The court considered factors of undue hardship, prima facie case, and financial burden in modifying the pre-deposit amounts, ultimately disposing of the writ petitions with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 343 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251317</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld a pre-deposit of Rs. 67 lakhs for the Meadows Project and reduced the pre-deposit for the Pacifica Project to 75% of Rs. 183 lakhs. The petitioner was directed to make the deposits within three weeks for expedited hearing and disposal of appeals by the CESTAT. The court considered factors of undue hardship, prima facie case, and financial burden in modifying the pre-deposit amounts, ultimately disposing of the writ petitions with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>