<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 340 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251314</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under the U.P. Trade Tax Act is valid only if, before issuance, the Assessing Officer has relevant material giving rise to a bona fide and rational reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment. The pre-existing jurisdictional basis must exist prior to notice; it cannot rest on arbitrary or extraneous grounds. Recording reasons in the notice itself may not always be mandatory, but the material and formation of belief must be shown on the file before issuance. Subsequent disclosure of reasons cannot cure the absence of that foundation, and a later notice setting out reasons does not validate the original notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 340 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251314</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under the U.P. Trade Tax Act is valid only if, before issuance, the Assessing Officer has relevant material giving rise to a bona fide and rational reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment. The pre-existing jurisdictional basis must exist prior to notice; it cannot rest on arbitrary or extraneous grounds. Recording reasons in the notice itself may not always be mandatory, but the material and formation of belief must be shown on the file before issuance. Subsequent disclosure of reasons cannot cure the absence of that foundation, and a later notice setting out reasons does not validate the original notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>