https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251313 Where a statute provides a complete and efficacious remedial mechanism for assessment and recovery disputes, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the prescribed appellate and objection procedures. The Court held that the petitioners had not shown due diligence in seeking certified copies in the prescribed manner, so the grievance of non-supply did not justify bypassing the statutory appeal. It also held that demand notices and certificate proceedings under the recovery law had to be challenged through the statutory scheme, including the available objection and appeal remedies; alleged ante-dating of assessment orders and related factual pleas were matters for the competent authority. en-us Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251313 Where a statute provides a complete and efficacious remedial mechanism for assessment and recovery disputes, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the prescribed appellate and objection procedures. The Court held that the petitioners had not shown due diligence in seeking certified copies in the prescribed manner, so the grievance of non-supply did not justify bypassing the statutory appeal. It also held that demand notices and certificate proceedings under the recovery law had to be challenged through the statutory scheme, including the available objection and appeal remedies; alleged ante-dating of assessment orders and related factual pleas were matters for the competent authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251313