<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 319 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251293</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amalgamation of two trusts resulting in a change of name did not impact the renewal of an exemption certificate under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the refusal to renew the certificate was unjustified as the trust&#039;s identity remained the same. The Court emphasized the significance of factual accuracy and concluded that no substantial legal question arose, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:00:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 319 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251293</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amalgamation of two trusts resulting in a change of name did not impact the renewal of an exemption certificate under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the refusal to renew the certificate was unjustified as the trust&#039;s identity remained the same. The Court emphasized the significance of factual accuracy and concluded that no substantial legal question arose, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>