<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 881 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166272</link>
    <description>Audited books, without rejection or evidence of bogus purchases or suppressed sales, do not justify a notional addition for alleged excess raw material consumption; actual manufacturing facts, wastage and production conditions must govern the assessment, and any adjustment for contract manufacturing must be matched consistently where the same input-output approach is applied. Advertising and publicity expenditure that is revenue in nature and incurred wholly and exclusively for business remains deductible under section 37(1), and its allowability is not defeated merely because the amount was spread over more than one accounting year in the books. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee obtained substantive relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 881 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166272</link>
      <description>Audited books, without rejection or evidence of bogus purchases or suppressed sales, do not justify a notional addition for alleged excess raw material consumption; actual manufacturing facts, wastage and production conditions must govern the assessment, and any adjustment for contract manufacturing must be matched consistently where the same input-output approach is applied. Advertising and publicity expenditure that is revenue in nature and incurred wholly and exclusively for business remains deductible under section 37(1), and its allowability is not defeated merely because the amount was spread over more than one accounting year in the books. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee obtained substantive relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>