https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166268 The Tribunal modified the stay order in favor of the appellant, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition for the hearing of their appeal. Relying on precedent decisions and analyzing the nature of services provided under the contract for the supply of potable water, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument and allowed the modification application. The decision aligned with earlier rulings and emphasized the importance of considering the primary objective of the contract in determining tax liability, ultimately granting the appellant an unconditional stay based on the interpretation of the contract terms and legal principles established in previous case law. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:25:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166268 The Tribunal modified the stay order in favor of the appellant, dispensing with the pre-deposit condition for the hearing of their appeal. Relying on precedent decisions and analyzing the nature of services provided under the contract for the supply of potable water, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument and allowed the modification application. The decision aligned with earlier rulings and emphasized the importance of considering the primary objective of the contract in determining tax liability, ultimately granting the appellant an unconditional stay based on the interpretation of the contract terms and legal principles established in previous case law. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166268