<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1006 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166264</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of CESTAT, which had dismissed the appeal regarding the wrongful availment of Cenvat credit by the respondent-assessee. The court found that the assessee had rectified the mistake by readjusting the credit and paying interest, leading to the conclusion that no further proceedings could be initiated once the violation was rectified. The High Court held that the appeal lacked any substantial question of law and thus dismissed it for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1006 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166264</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of CESTAT, which had dismissed the appeal regarding the wrongful availment of Cenvat credit by the respondent-assessee. The court found that the assessee had rectified the mistake by readjusting the credit and paying interest, leading to the conclusion that no further proceedings could be initiated once the violation was rectified. The High Court held that the appeal lacked any substantial question of law and thus dismissed it for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>