<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 913 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166263</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC modified the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit condition, holding that the duty deposit requirement could be replaced by execution of a general bond for the full duty amount. The Court noted that Board instructions in the Excise Manual required due consideration, that the petitioner was a Government of India undertaking with unquestioned solvency, and that a prima facie case for complete waiver had been made out. On those facts, the Court found that the ends of justice would be met by dispensing with the monetary pre-deposit and substituting a general bond, granting partial relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 913 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166263</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC modified the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit condition, holding that the duty deposit requirement could be replaced by execution of a general bond for the full duty amount. The Court noted that Board instructions in the Excise Manual required due consideration, that the petitioner was a Government of India undertaking with unquestioned solvency, and that a prima facie case for complete waiver had been made out. On those facts, the Court found that the ends of justice would be met by dispensing with the monetary pre-deposit and substituting a general bond, granting partial relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>