<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 296 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251270</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the request for total waiver of pre-deposit and directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs, to be held by the Tribunal pending appeal disposal. The Tribunal was instructed to revive the appeals, ensuring a fair adjudication process with opportunities for both parties. The Court stressed the need for discretion under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act to be exercised judiciously, taking into account financial hardships and other pertinent factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 296 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251270</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the request for total waiver of pre-deposit and directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs, to be held by the Tribunal pending appeal disposal. The Tribunal was instructed to revive the appeals, ensuring a fair adjudication process with opportunities for both parties. The Court stressed the need for discretion under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act to be exercised judiciously, taking into account financial hardships and other pertinent factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>