<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251260</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reopening of assessment for the year 2003-2004, finding it justified under Section 150(1) as a consequence of a Tribunal finding. The decision to spread the unexplained investment over two years was affirmed, directing the Assessing Officers to determine the accurate cost of construction. The writ petitions contesting the reopening were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251260</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reopening of assessment for the year 2003-2004, finding it justified under Section 150(1) as a consequence of a Tribunal finding. The decision to spread the unexplained investment over two years was affirmed, directing the Assessing Officers to determine the accurate cost of construction. The writ petitions contesting the reopening were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>