<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1109 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166254</link>
    <description>Entitlement to credit under Rule 57Q depended on whether the duty related to goods specified in the tariff schedule, and the record did not clearly establish that the supply was only of tariff-covered parts. The repair and testing order, together with the bill, primarily reflected repair and testing of the rotor assembly, with only incidental supply of new diode plates. Because the Tribunal had not examined whether that activity or supply answered the relevant tariff description, its relief could not stand and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:39:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1109 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166254</link>
      <description>Entitlement to credit under Rule 57Q depended on whether the duty related to goods specified in the tariff schedule, and the record did not clearly establish that the supply was only of tariff-covered parts. The repair and testing order, together with the bill, primarily reflected repair and testing of the rotor assembly, with only incidental supply of new diode plates. Because the Tribunal had not examined whether that activity or supply answered the relevant tariff description, its relief could not stand and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>