<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 260 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 based on the pro-note entry, confirming the total sale consideration at Rs. 1,65,00,000. However, it overturned the denial of exemption under Section 54, directing the AO to grant the exemption as the property contained a semi-finished residential structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 260 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 based on the pro-note entry, confirming the total sale consideration at Rs. 1,65,00,000. However, it overturned the denial of exemption under Section 54, directing the AO to grant the exemption as the property contained a semi-finished residential structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>