<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 258 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-calculate the Arm&#039;s Length Price by excluding companies with extraordinarily high profits or losses and considering appropriate adjustments for differences in business functions and risks. The Tribunal also instructed the use of Profit Before Depreciation and Tax (PBDIT) as the Profit Level Indicator for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 258 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-calculate the Arm&#039;s Length Price by excluding companies with extraordinarily high profits or losses and considering appropriate adjustments for differences in business functions and risks. The Tribunal also instructed the use of Profit Before Depreciation and Tax (PBDIT) as the Profit Level Indicator for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>