<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 254 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251228</link>
    <description>The Sikkim High Court rejected the objection to territorial jurisdiction, upholding that the agreement and lottery operations took place in Sikkim. It declared that lottery ticket transactions were not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994, based on previous judgments. The court quashed three communications from the Mumbai Office, ruling them invalid due to the lack of service tax liability on lottery transactions. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 254 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251228</link>
      <description>The Sikkim High Court rejected the objection to territorial jurisdiction, upholding that the agreement and lottery operations took place in Sikkim. It declared that lottery ticket transactions were not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994, based on previous judgments. The court quashed three communications from the Mumbai Office, ruling them invalid due to the lack of service tax liability on lottery transactions. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>