<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 250 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the appellant was granted the opportunity for a personal hearing to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of all issues, including the classification of services as works contract services. All issues were left open for the adjudicating authority to decide, with no express opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 250 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the appellant was granted the opportunity for a personal hearing to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of all issues, including the classification of services as works contract services. All issues were left open for the adjudicating authority to decide, with no express opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>