https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251213 The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal for failure to comply with the pre-deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that adherence to the pre-deposit requirement is mandatory for the proper constitution of an appeal under Section 35B, emphasizing that non-compliance leads to dismissal. The Court distinguished previous judgments cited by the appellant and relied on Supreme Court decisions related to the Customs Act, 1962, to support its ruling. Failure to deposit the required amount results in appeal dismissal, aligning with established legal principles. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251213 The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal for failure to comply with the pre-deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that adherence to the pre-deposit requirement is mandatory for the proper constitution of an appeal under Section 35B, emphasizing that non-compliance leads to dismissal. The Court distinguished previous judgments cited by the appellant and relied on Supreme Court decisions related to the Customs Act, 1962, to support its ruling. Failure to deposit the required amount results in appeal dismissal, aligning with established legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251213