<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 219 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251193</link>
    <description>Advance Authorisation entitlement was linked to the FOB/FOR value of exports in the immediately preceding licensing year, so the applicant&#039;s entitlement was correctly computed with reference to its 2010-11 exports and limited to Rs. 38,83,52,050. The Handbook of Procedures could not override the Foreign Trade Policy, and a status holder&#039;s policy-level exemption from furnishing bank guarantees prevailed over a handbook requirement for authorisation granted beyond entitlement. The bank guarantee condition was therefore inapplicable to the applicant, and the impugned communication was set aside only to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 219 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251193</link>
      <description>Advance Authorisation entitlement was linked to the FOB/FOR value of exports in the immediately preceding licensing year, so the applicant&#039;s entitlement was correctly computed with reference to its 2010-11 exports and limited to Rs. 38,83,52,050. The Handbook of Procedures could not override the Foreign Trade Policy, and a status holder&#039;s policy-level exemption from furnishing bank guarantees prevailed over a handbook requirement for authorisation granted beyond entitlement. The bank guarantee condition was therefore inapplicable to the applicant, and the impugned communication was set aside only to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>