<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 216 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the significance of accurately determining the value of goods transferred in works contracts to correctly assess the service tax liability. The decision highlighted the importance of considering actual data provided by the applicant and applying Rule 2A provisions in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=364672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 216 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the significance of accurately determining the value of goods transferred in works contracts to correctly assess the service tax liability. The decision highlighted the importance of considering actual data provided by the applicant and applying Rule 2A provisions in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>